Friday, June 1, 2007

Shenzhen Speed

We crossed the border from Hong Kong into Shenzhen, China last Saturday. The crossing was a bit of a disaster. I realized that my backpack was missing and I had to go back to the University of Hong Kong to get it. The students and the professors went to the border without me, and I crossed alone about an hour after them. The crossing itself was very easy and fast, but I found out when I caught up with the group that one of our students had been turned away because of a typo on her visa. This is the kind of thing you hope doesn’t happen, but that there's no easy solution for when it does. She and one of the professors had to double back to Hong Kong and wait two days to get to the Chinese embassy for a fresh visa.

In the meantime, the rest of us got an introduction to the phenomenon known as “Shenzhen Speed.” A town that was a sleepy fishing village of about 30,000 in the early '80's (less than the year-round population of Chapel Hill, NC), a mere two decades has transformed Shenzhen into a towering metropolis of over 12 million. The “King of the Earth” skyscraper is noted not so much for its design as for the fact that it was constructed at a rate of one story every three days (total of 69 stories). The first and most successful special economic zone (SEZ), Shenzhen is now home to the world's largest factory complex, the Foxconn facility that employs 200,000 workers who make (among many products) every single iPod nano in the world. We visited the Foxconn facility yesterday, but of course what we saw and heard was far different from others.

On the streets of Shenzhen, you can still buy scallion pancakes from street vendors and get run over by a bicycle, just like every other city in China. However, you can also buy limitless numbers of knockoff designer brand products, depending on how much you want to get yelled at and fined by US Customs. You can also hear the sound of the next stage of global warming, as the horns from skyrocketing private car ownership sound off and drivers hit pedestrians (China has the highest pedestrian fatality rate in the world), cut each other off, and idle in the middle of intersections while they figure out where they want to go.

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta

Hong Kong is located near the mouth of the Pearl River, which flows from Sichuan Province through southern China. The delta lies in Guangdong Province, where Deng Xiaopeng’s economic reforms began in 1981 with the establishment of the first “special economic zone” (SEZ) right next to the border with Hong Kong. This border already had great significance in Chinese economic history. In 1949, after the Communists rose to power, capital of all sorts drained out of the mainland and into Hong Kong. Money, talent, labor, experience, ideas, and energy brought a new level of activity to Hong Kong that the British alone had never achieved. Many refugees chose Hong Kong over Taiwan because it was more established. Their greatest priority was economic security, and this mentality continues in Hong Kong today. Though many yearn for democracy, the most important thing to the average Hong Kong person is the stability of the economy.

The Hong Kong economic juggernaut that started in 1950 attained new heights after the opening of China through the nearby SEZ. Where once garments and toys labeled “Made in Hong Kong” were common, production facilities shifted to the mainland to take advantage of cheaper land and labor. This produced a spatially bifurcated economy known as the “Front Shops, Back Factories” model. The capital, design, and leadership come from Hong Kong, while the raw materials and labor come from the Pearl River Delta. Hong Kong’s special role as a gateway to China became more important and enriching than ever, now that China was eager to export.

Today, however, exactly what the special role is for Hong Kong is less clear. When SARS struck Hong Kong in 2003, the economy took a nosedive. Commercial activity came to standstill. Today in Hong Kong, residents often remark on this or that place that they used to go to that closed during SARS, never to re-open. After the epidemic, what saved Hong Kong was the Pearl River Delta. At the request (more like desperate begging) of the Hong Kong government, the Chinese central government eased the border control between Guangdong Province and Hong Kong. A special, easy-to-get visa that allowed day trips to Hong Kong by mainland visitors was created. Now, the new middle and upper classes created in China by the economic reforms come to Hong Kong to spend hundreds of thousands of yuan on the very latest genuine designer merchandise. As in 1950, Hong Kong prospers from capital flowing over the border from China. This time, however, it’s a reciprocal relationship – Hong Kong is still a major source of the venture capital that supports the Pearl River Delta enterprises that are creating new wealth in China.

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Why isn't Hong Kong like Bangkok?

Well, obviously there are a lot of reasons. This question was asked by a student concerning transportation in particular. Among the many large, compact megacities in Asia, Bangkok has become notorious for traffic congestion and air pollution. Drivers of Thai motorcycle taxis wear face masks when out on the street, and the mass transit system is dilapidated and under-used. On the other hand, while Hong Kong is not without air quality problems or rush hour jams, it is not only possible but easy to cross half of Hong Kong Island and head deep into Kowloon in less than half an hour (including transfers), for about $2 US, with no knowledge of Cantonese language or literacy in Chinese characters.

Density and land use mixing are both generators of traffic and prerequisites for transit. Bangkok and Hong Kong are both extraordinarily dense centers of housing, commerce, industry, culture, and government. So why is one choked with vehicles while the other, despite much more challenging geographic constraints (water, topography) provides extraordinary mobility? Clearly one part of the problem is simply inadequate transit development in Bangkok. The train system there was developed right before the 1998 Asian financial crisis, and the system’s implementation was crippled by the ensuing recession. Hong Kong’s system is partially privatized, and benefits from state-of-the-art infrastructure, scheduling, and fare collection. However, variations in transit quality alone don’t seem like enough to explain the globally sub-par transportation situation in Bangkok or the bold success of Hong Kong.

The answer lies in the realization that transportation planning is like a coin. On one side are the necessary conditions for mass mobility: land use density/mix and transit infrastructure. On the other side are the sufficient conditions to guarantee transit success: pedestrian safety, market-based anti-car policies, and transportation demand management. It must be easy and safe to walk, with a minimum of obstacles and threats from other transportation modes. Anti-car policies include scarce parking, expensive permitting, fuel taxes, and road pricing. And finally, transportation demand management enables and rewards frequent transit use through education, trip subsidy/discounts (at right, the Hong Kong 'octopus' card), and policies and programs targeting employers. When you turn over the coin in Bangkok, it is blank. In Hong Kong, you’d probably have to use one of those crazy micro-lasers that can write the whole Bible on a grain of rice to fit it all in.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

ARRR!!!

Speaking of globalization, guess what I'm doing tonight?

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

New Towns

In 1960 Hong Kong began establishing new towns in the land outside of the existing, densely developed settlements of Kowloon and Hong Kong island. Extending all the way to the border of the New Territories, dozens of settlements were established on previously agricultural or unused land, the most recent being North Lantau in 1997. The idea of creating new urban areas from whole cloth rather than extending existing urban areas is a concept that dates from medieval Europe, when city sizes were restricted by walkability, food and water supply, and defensibility. European countries, with the exception of the Netherlands, ceased establishing new towns during the Renaissance. Much later, after the industrial revolution, new town planning was revived in Britain by Ebenezer Howard.

Howard's desire to create new towns was a direct response to the grim living conditions of urban Britain. Urban populations had increased dramatically as a result of the high demand for workers in industrial centers, producing major overcrowding, fire risk, public health problems, and so on. Where once living in the center of the city was desirable, those who could afford to began retreating to the urban fringe, forming suburbs. However, employment was still concentrated downtown. Howard conceived of new Garden Cities that would be self-sufficient nodes of both housing and jobs, proximate to major cities for communication, specialty services, and the like, but with no need for daily regional travel.

There's a lot more to Howard's work that I won't go into here. Try here if you want more. Suffice to say that his influence is still strong with British town planners today, and so when Hong Kong reached a breaking point in terms of crowding, new towns were created as the solution. The population was dispersed to the New Territories in a series of settlements, many of which were linked to Kowloon by rail. Creating new towns rather than extending or adapting existing urban areas gave planners almost total freedom to shape the settlements, with the critical goal being to achieve jobs-housing balance, the necessary criterion for self-sufficiency.

Though Hong Kong's attempts at new town planning are the most ambitious ever implemented in the world (Howard himself only built two in England), with nine new towns settled over 40 years by a government with total control over the supply of land and an incredibly successful public transit system (60 - 85% of trips in Hong Kong are via transit), the towns by and large have failed. Though they did succeed in expanding the supply of housing, a jobs-housing balance has never been achieved and the new towns represent the Hong Kong version of suburban living. In Tseung Kwan O, residents are primarily families with young children. Parents commute to Kowloon or Hong Kong island for work. Rather than a sleepy village or a hustling CBD, the shopping mall is the center of life.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Kowloon Walled City

Hong Kong Island was obtained by the British in 1842 as part of the Treaty of Nanjing that ended the first Opium War. Though opium was illegal in Britain, the British fought this war with China to ensure that they would have a commodity that there was demand for in China in order to correct the huge trade imbalance created by British demand for tea, spices, porcelain, silk, art, and other Chinese goods. Opium was one of the first truly global commodities, with a production chain wrapping the world. Grown in India, processed in Afghanistan, shipped by Americans, and sold by Brits in East Asia, opium was one of the first 'vertically integrated' global products, with all aspects of production from farm to front controlled by the British Empire.

The British obtained Hong Kong from the Qing emperor to use as a port in this trade. After the second opium war, the mainland side of the harbor, Kowloon, was added to the British possession. In 1898, the British leased the New Territories and Lantau Island for 99 years from the Qing, to ensure adequate food and water supply. It was the expiration of this lease that led to the return of the entire possession in 1997, since to separate the New Territories from Kowloon and HK Island by then would have been like returning a body but trying to keep a head alive.

The Qing court retained one 0.026 sq. km. parcel of land in Kowloon, a toehold that was kept as a garrison to keep an eye on the British. Known as the Kowloon Walled City, this fortified settlement was abandoned after the Qing dynasty fell in 1911, but remained Chinese territory. At that time, the population of the walled city was approximately 700. In the ensuing decades, the city became a lawless place, full of Triad mobsters and a lively informal economy composed of unlicensed and illegal businesses, secret factories, labyrinthine corridors where no sunlight ever shone. Lacking any planning regulation, buildings and utility service were modified at will. Eventually, the Kowloon Walled City reached the highest recorded residential densities in human history, with an estimated population of 50,000 inhabitants in the 1980's.

The Chinese and the British agreed to demolish the city in 1987, and today the site is the Kowloon Walled City Park.

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Hong Kong graveyards


Establishing and regulating cemeteries was a major issue in Hong Kong in the mid-19th century, due to plague. From roughly 1850 - 1870, formal cemeteries for the British, French, Jews, Muslims, Chinese Christians, Buddhists, and Zoroastrians had been established on the main island. In the 1890's, a separate cemetery was established for Eurasians. Hong Kong's growing Chinese merchant class was led by a few prominent Eurasians who played the role of compradore, first among them the Ho Tong family.

Sir Robert Ho Tung was Hong Kong's first millionaire, and the first person with Chinese ancestry allowed to live in the mid-levels on Mount Victoria. His brother, Ho Kom Tong, founded what is now known today at the Chiu Yuen cemetery, containing family plots of wealthy Eurasian families. Ho Kom Tong is my great-great-grandfather, so I was able to obtain access to the cemetery yesterday. Shown above is the family plot.

I visited the grave of my mother's mother's mother (great-grandmother) to pay my respects.