There's a growing interest in preserving the more prosaic spaces of Chinese urban life, however, especially this new fad in Beijing for weeping over the impending doom of the city's hutong neighborhoods as the Olympics approach. I couldn't agree more about preserving the hutongs, but the will to do that has to come from native Chinese, not expats drunk on exotic Old Beijing. I mean, I'm sure expats can help, given the huge role that foreign direct investment plays in China. I just see a lot more talking than doing, which always annoys me.

We visited the architects' office, and the first thing they emphasized was that this was not historic preservation, simply an urban development with a historic influence. The architect had a very simple definition of what it means to be urban - connected and related to what is around you, in space and time. I love that definition. It's very simple and very clear. However, a historic preservationist would have saved as much of the old neighborhood as possible, while Ben Woods saved only those buildings and spaces that could be profitable in the final development, and gutted all of the interiors. It would be so cool if projects like Xintiandi could be done for areas other than the most wealthy spaces in Shanghai, and if more could be preserved. It's not really reasonable to expect the private sector to do that, so maybe the growing community of Chinese NGOs will spawn historic preservation groups that want to work with the government to do that kind of project.
1 comment:
Your blog postings are getting more fascinating each week! Do you think you would go back to China to work someday? I hear the Urban Land Institute in DC (Rick Rosan) is opening an office in China.
Post a Comment